In a Gulf country, a man demands that his ex-wife return 7 cars and about a million dollars

Sports



A man in the UAE demanded that his ex-wife return to him seven cars he owned, including two “Porsche” and “Lexus” cars, all registered in his name; According to the newspaper, “Emirates Today”.

The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a woman to return seven cars to her ex-husband, as the vehicles are still registered in the name of the plaintiff, while it rejected the plaintiff’s request for compensation for denying him the use of cars.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife, obligating her to return seven cars to him, and to pay him 3,339,350 dirhams (901,624 dollars) in compensation for the damages he sustained, pointing out that the defendant was his wife and he had four children from her.

The man said that he owned seven cars in the former marital home, and that the defendant had previously filed a personal status lawsuit in which a ruling was issued obligating the plaintiff to provide her with two cars.

He confirmed that after the defendant was sentenced to return the cars to him, except for the two cars in which the judgment was passed in her favour, namely “Porsche” and “Lexus”, the defendant refused without justification, pointing out that he had sustained damages due to his being denied the use of cars.

In turn, the defendant submitted a memorandum that included a counterclaim, in which she indicated that the judgment issued in the personal status lawsuit obligated her ex-husband to provide two cars and bear their expenses, and that the plaintiff gave up the cars in question for his children, and that she paid most of the installments of the Rolls-Royce car, and also paid a part A large part of the Mercedes car installments came from her own money and she handed it to the plaintiff in cash, and that he paid a small part of the installments as a gift, and registered the two cars in his name and that she did not get a payment receipt from him, because he was her husband.

She indicated that she does not use these cars for her personal interest, but rather they are intended for the benefit of the plaintiff’s children who are in her custody.

And she demanded the judiciary to reject the original lawsuit, prove her ownership of the “Rolls-Rice” car, and prove that her ex-husband donated other cars to serve his children.

In the ruling, the court stated that the evidence in the papers is that all seven vehicles are registered in the name of the plaintiff, and the court heard witnesses whose statements came that the defendant was using that vehicle, and that it was in charge of renewing and maintaining licenses, and the testimony did not indicate that the defendant was the one who purchased the vehicle. And the plaintiff has 6 other vehicles located in the marital villa, and the defendant used them as well, and this does not affect what the Personal Status Court decided to provide two vehicles for the benefit of his children, as he chooses the appropriate vehicles for his children.

The court pointed out that the plaintiff’s statements that he had given her a “Rolls-Rice” vehicle came without proof and evidence, and the vehicle was still registered in the name of her ex-husband, and she had the burden of proving the gift, donation, or even paying the amount; What with the request is based on an incorrect deed, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant to return the seven vehicles to the plaintiff, and rejected other requests, with obligating the defendant to pay the fees and expenses of the original lawsuit, and rejecting the corresponding lawsuit with obligating the filer to pay the expenses.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *