Khomeinism, Hezbollah and the Houthis


Despite the strong ideological and sectarian ties between them, Khomeinism in Iran is different from Hezbollah in Lebanon, and these are different from the Houthis in Yemen.

Khomeinism established a clerical state in Iran. She reformulated the state institutions, the army, and the intelligence services to be the organs of the Guardian Jurist, not the state. Khomeinism aims internally to consolidate the deep state of the clergy within the formal institutions of the ‘republic’ state, and externally to impose the control of the sectarian minority over the majority.

On the other hand, Hezbollah does not seek to establish the state of the cleric in Lebanon, but rather to establish the state of the “dominant sect”. In order to establish a sectarian state on the ruins of a sectarian state, it is necessary to establish a “party state” and to rule Lebanon through the “master” instead of the president. And the party state does not recognize the concept of national sovereignty and owes direct allegiance to the Iranian Wali al-Faqih in the first public and open act in the history of the peoples.

As for the Houthi movement, it is not a sectarian movement, as the majority think. Rather, it is a dynastic/racist movement. It does not aim to spread sectarian awareness or a particular doctrine as much as it aims to spread all the ideas that support the control of the Al al-Bayt dynasty over power, wealth and religion. That is why her ideas came from a mixture of Twelvers, Zaydis, Salafism, and the Brotherhood. It operates with a cross-sectarian tactic that has been able to spread Shiism within Sunni and Sufi environments in Yemen, based on the sanctification of all these doctrines for the family of the house.

Behind these differences, the three phenomena are similar in the following:

They are all anti-social because they see themselves above society and not part of it. All of them are hostile to the state because the concept of the modern state contradicts its sectarianism, sectarianism, dynasty and narrow racism. For this, all resorted to the establishment of a state within the state or two parallel states. A formal state without powers, a hidden state with a secret budget, a sectarian army, hidden institutions and an elusive ideology that is only announced in private councils and secret education courses.

All of which are manifestations of the rise of Shiite political Islam. Islam is against the state, against society and against life itself, because its ultimate goal is to restore Karbala to death, blood and blackness.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *