The motives of Iran and the Houthis behind the storming of the US embassy in Sana’a

Sports



Nothing is more surprising than the developments propelled by the Yemeni war. On the tenth of November, the Houthis triggered a serious crisis with the United States; It was the storming of the US embassy compound located in the Sawan neighborhood, east of the city of Sanaa, and looting its contents, after a series of arrests that affected dozens of local embassy employees, in an effort that reveals a state of deep frustration among the Houthis over the possibility of luring the Americans to support their plans to establish absolute influence in the country. Northern part of Yemen.

The US administration adopted a cautious rhetoric about the issue of the attack on its embassy compound in Sana’a, condemning in the strongest terms the storming step, but at the same time described its diplomatic facility in Sana’a as “the compound that was used as the embassy’s headquarters,” a description that was repeated in the statement of the UN Security Council. This is something through which Washington wanted to lower the level of expectations that the Houthis and the Iranians had from storming the embassy complex and looting its contents.

The United Nations immediately moved the Security Council and in turn issued a strong, unanimous statement of its 15 members, condemning this Houthi behavior, and calling for “the immediate withdrawal of all Houthi elements from the site, and the immediate and safe release of those still in detention.” However, the international situation did not have a direct impact on the position of the Houthis, and did not succeed in getting them to end the attack on the headquarters of the embassy of a great foreign country, but the Houthis, in turn, began to feel that the move to move the embassy file did not succeed in escalating it to a crisis level that would allow opening a negotiation path with the Americans .

Tehran, as it is clear, is strongly behind the step of storming the American embassy in Sanaa, and even directs this step, and is trying, through its dictates to the Houthis, to obtain a trump card that can strengthen its negotiating position with the West over the nuclear file.

This certainly should not forget the fact that Tehran is like the Houthis; They have a common goal in drowning out the American diplomatic efforts made to end the war with a crisis that redirects the compass of American moves towards Sanaa and building understandings with it, after the Houthis noticed that the American envoy to Yemen Timothy Lenderking expresses convictions identical to Saudi positions, with a clear rise in the tone of criticism directed against the behavior of the Houthis and their military plans to continue the war in Marib.

The current US administration, which began its term by showing clear sympathy, or less hardening towards the Houthis, seems to be witnessing an important shift in its stance towards the Yemen war, apparently dissolving from the tense background that governed the Democrats’ positions regarding this war as a Saudi war on Yemen, and as a cause In the presence of the largest humanity in the world based on the description of the United Nations, a position from which the Houthis benefited greatly and went on the path of war; In the hope of obtaining the province of Ma’rib and its oil and gas.

The US administration has collected many evidences that make its continuing to cover up the Houthis and their crimes outrageous, as keenness to end the war in the name of ending the humanitarian crisis will not make any sense, while the Houthis continue to expose more than 1.5 million people living in the city of Ma’rib; This is one of the most dangerous and worst consequences of the war on the Yemeni arena, and this explains why the US attitudes towards the Houthis’ hard behavior have escalated, and why Washington has blessed the inclusion of three new Houthi figures on the Security Council’s list of those covered by the imposed sanctions. Indeed, the US State Department imposed sanctions on an official in the Houthi group responsible for Confiscation of citizens’ property.

What struck me most about the continued American escalation against the Houthi group were the statements attributed to Envoy Lenderking; In which he considered that “it is time for all Yemeni groups to make progress in the Riyadh Agreement, and to confront the common threats of Houthi provocations, the economic crisis and insecurity,” during his meeting in Riyadh with a delegation representing the Southern Transitional Council.

That the confrontation with al-Houthi be based on the unity of the opposing groups, an American goal and priority; This means that the envoy, Linder King, as his country is, is now at a distance from the Houthis, and more aware that getting involved in giving Iran a trump card in Yemen will make it difficult in many files that Washington needs to obtain an Iranian response to.

*Arabic 21



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *