The story is bigger than “Qardahi”


After a long patience – like Ayoub’s patience – Saudi Arabia finally did it and decided to correct its relationship with the kidnapped Lebanese state, after it summoned its ambassador residing in Beirut, and asked the Lebanese ambassador to leave Riyadh. The use of Ayoub’s patience to characterize it came because abusive acts before sayings have been repeated for many years, matched by the kingdom’s great dream and patience, in the hope of correcting these negative attitudes… And with all the warnings issued by Riyadh to the successive Lebanese governments, and more, the Saudi patience has gradually begun to run out. As a result of the repeated negative steps by the Lebanese side, towards Saudi Arabia, its policies and its people, accompanied by bright gossip and false promises from the changing governments, but the actions did not reflect those gossip… which proves the absence of sincere intentions, unfortunately!
Those who think that the Saudi decisions were taken after the statements of the Lebanese Minister of Information, George Qardahi, although any country that receives these aggressive stances has the right to take what it deems appropriate with its sovereignty is mistaken. However, the story, which the majority knows, is that Qardahi’s statements are only “the straw that broke the camel’s back”… From the transformation of the Lebanese state into a major international drug crossing targeting Saudi Arabia, and the Lebanese government’s failure to respond to the Saudi demand to stop the export of drugs through Lebanese exports For the Kingdom, to Hezbollah’s leadership of a declared strategy of hostility with Saudi Arabia from the gates of the Lebanese state, in addition to supporting, training and equipping the Houthis, and it does not end with the Lebanese government ministers professing their hostility to Saudi Arabia, not least Qardahi, who was not satisfied with supporting the Houthi attacks on Saudi civilian areas, but he He later asserted – boastfully – that his positions were correct, and that he would not back down from them. So, after all these repeated hostile stances, is the Saudi government blamed for taking the “minimum” measures to protect its sovereignty, satisfaction and interests?!
It is not new to say that what prevented Saudi Arabia for years from taking strong measures in response to the hostile stances of the Lebanese state, is its concern for the Lebanese people, who are overwhelmed by the government of their country. Saudi concern for the Lebanese people can be demonstrated by not taking any decision against hundreds of thousands of Lebanese working in the kingdom, even as the Lebanese government – through its Minister of Information – supports civilian attacks on Saudi citizens. I can say objectively: the Saudi government was more concerned with the Lebanese citizens than their government. Also, despite the continuous mobilization in many Lebanese media against the Saudi people, and against Saudi tourists (the few) when they visit Lebanon, and the attacks that dozens of them have been subjected to, not a single Lebanese has been subjected to any attack in Saudi Arabia, and they live as if they have been in their country for decades. They lack security and stability in their homeland, why?! The answer is simply because the Saudi government completely separates what the government of their country does from them. It did not incite them, nor did its citizens encroach upon them, as did Hezbollah and the government on which it rides… The best evidence is what was stated in the statement of the Saudi Foreign Ministry when it affirmed the keenness of the “government of The Kingdom is against the Lebanese citizens residing in the Kingdom, whom it considers part of the fabric and cohesion that unites the Saudi people and their Arab brothers residing in the Kingdom.
Saudi Arabia did what it should do a long time ago, and the ball is now in the court of the remaining Lebanese forces, with calculations that cannot be mistaken again. They must determine where Lebanon’s real interests lie, and try to answer the “million question”: Is Lebanon destined to continue hijacking, Iranian, and aggressive against its brothers? And if the answer is with the old, worn-out and worn out response: “We have no tricks in our hands.” It is natural that they should not expect others to defend their interests more than they do.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *